Tag Archives: Microsoft

Exchange Server 2010 goes live, will extend rights-managed e-mail to browsers

By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

Microsoft Exchange top story badgeOne of the more important features of Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 (or Exchange 2010, depending upon whom you’re talking to), officially launched for sale this morning during a TechEd conference in Berlin, is a system for mail administrators to implement policy-driven rights management that’s ensured not just for Outlook 2010 (Office) users, but also users of the Outlook Web App running through Web browsers, including Mozilla Firefox and Apple Safari.

These rights management features, called Transport Protection Rules, will enable admins to generate extensive rules that restrict, where necessary, an e-mail recipient’s ability to make alternate uses of the content of e-mail, including simply copying and pasting its text elsewhere, if messages are deemed confidential. Corporate Vice President Stephen Elop and Exchange product manager Julie White demonstrated TPR to a TechEd crowd that appeared, at least from the live feed from Berlin, to be less-than-capacity, though which Microsoft described as a sellout crowd of 7,000.

During this morning’s demo, White showed how OWA typically enables the e-mail client to prohibit unrestricted use of an e-mail’s content if the sender explicitly flags the mail as confidential. Transport Protection Rules, by contrast, enables the creation of a policy restriction template that may be applied whenever any content sent from a specified account meets the criteria. That criteria includes the inclusion of phrases within the content of the mail itself — White’s demo involved the phrase launch plans.

Outlook Web App for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010

A TPR can be designed, the demo showed, where a rule can search outgoing content for the specific phrase, and if that phrase is located, Exchange can apply the confidentiality rule that the original sender may have neglected to apply. The message becomes confidential because content is always being evaluated by Exchange. The restrictions, including inability to copy and paste text or to forward the message to other recipients, may be enforced on non-Microsoft browsers including Firefox.

In fact, TechEd attendees this morning saw more of Firefox than Internet Explorer; and when Elop pointed this out, attendees offered the biggest round of applause of the day.

“Integrated information rights management is now natively supported within Outlook Web App,” said White, “so that now users can create protected messages without needing an additional plug-in, or taking any extra steps. And that means fewer support desk calls for you [the admins].”

TPR was perhaps one of the few Exchange features that was actually new to at least some of the admins in the audience today, as Microsoft execs would later acknowledge that the ES 2010 beta program was perhaps the largest in the company’s history — even larger than for Windows. The reason, stated Corporate Vice President Chris Capossela during a staged Q&A following the TechEd keynote, was that a multitude of colleges worldwide adopted Exchange during the beta program, and signed their students up. Over 10 million students worldwide effectively became users of Exchange Server, and many of those effectively of the new Outlook Web App.

So some of the other features execs showed off today ended up being old news to many, including how Exchange and OWA implement conversation view — the ability to automatically categorize e-mails as threaded conversations based on their subject lines — and the “Ignore Conversation” feature, which lets the client skip future messages belonging to unwanted conversations. At one point, Elop prodded the audience for a response. “Some applause, something, anything?” he asked. “A little love, please?”

Today’s Exchange rollout comes on the same day as Cisco announced its own Unified Communications System 8.0 platform update, which integrates a new collaboration toolkit and a hosted e-mail option, putting Cisco in direct competition with Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Notes.

This morning, Capossela dismissed Cisco’s move by painting it as something less than unified, pushing Exchange as a product that has grown organically over the years “rather than stitching together acquired products and calling that the solution,” referring to Cisco’s propensity for acquisition. Cisco’s platform does include the secured instant messaging tool it now calls Unified Presence 8.0, but which came to prominence as Jabber prior to a Cisco acquisition in September 2008.

Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009

Link to the original site

Windows 7 Endless Reboot Answer Evades Microsoft

Users remained stymied today by endless reboots after trying to upgrade their PCs to Windows 7, according to messages posted on Microsoft’s support forum. An answer has yet to be found for all users, who began reporting the problem last Friday after watching the upgrade stall two-thirds of the way through the process.

Link to the original site

Bad Vista-to-Windows 7 upgrade experiences #2: No TV in Media Center

By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

Typically when you upgrade a computer from one operating system to the very next level up, you don’t want the new system replacing or deleting anything without your knowledge and approval. Windows 7 thus far seems to be quite good on this score. But perhaps it’s too good in the case of its new and somewhat enhanced Windows Media Center, whose new reliance on an upstream recording prevention mechanism that’s part of its PlayReady scheme, among other things, renders obsolete Vista’s media settings.

As a result, if you have a TV tuner in your Vista-based PC, and you follow all the instructions for migrating to Win7, the new Media Center could insist you don’t have a TV there at all. Betanews was able to reconstruct the conditions of a situation some upgraders are reporting where their built-in tuners disappear. Luckily, we also have a solution to the problem that worked for us, and that may hopefully work for you if you’re in similar circumstances.
But let’s concede right off the bat, it’s not an easy or intuitive solution, so don’t blame yourself thinking there’s something you missed.

Betanews recreated the problem using a Vista-based dual-core Intel PC, and a Hauppage WinTV PVR-350 tuner card. This is an older card that takes in analog signals in SD, not HD, from cable or antenna, although we found some TV tuner card users had other models. Device Manager clearly recognizes the tuner card for what it is. But after switching on Media Center for the first time, the program complained that it could not find the TV tuner.

It’s a problem that was reported as early as last May by a Windows 7 tester, who reported to Microsoft at the time: “I upgraded to the RC of Win7 and everything went beautifully. Even stressed the install by ‘having’ a four-year-old turn off the machine in the middle! When I got to the end, I was checking out how stuff was working and went into Media Center. When trying to play live TV, I get a message that it can’t find the tuner card. No update for the driver thru [Windows Update].”

More recently, there was this from the SageTV Community: “I had installed Win 7 the first time with the [Hauppage] PVR-350 installed in the machine, so I thought the driver install was messed up so I removed the card and did a fresh install of Windows 7 without it and then installed the card but same outcome. The Device Manager shows Video Capture Device as not installed and when I try to update the driver it fails to install.”

Microsoft MVPs suggested to many individuals that they try installing an older version of the WinTV drivers, preferably one intended for XP, using Compatibility Mode during the installation. We found no evidence of anyone attempting this and succeeding. Then we tried this ourselves with no success either. As we discovered, this method is actually guaranteed to fail.
Other willing assistants from Microsoft and elsewhere have offered what seems like sound enough advice at any time: Find and install the latest available drivers. But here is where folks were running into problems too: Microsoft established its Windows 7 Compatibility Center to direct individuals to the drivers and support software they need for their components and software to run in the new OS. But Microsoft doesn’t actually host the files itself — that would be a Herculean task. So it directs users to the manufacturers’ Web pages where the files should be found.

Hauppage PVR-350 TV tuner card shows up in Microsoft's Windows 7 Compatibility Center.

At the time of our test, the Compatibility Center notified us that the PVR-350 is compatible with Windows 7. (This turns out to be quite correct.) But the download link takes us to Hauppage’s US Web site, where the same “Compatible with Windows 7″ badge appears as shown on Microsoft’s site. However, Hauppage reports, “WinTV-PVR is not certified for use with Windows 7, though it will work in many systems with Windows 7 32-bit version.”

This is somewhat ominous sounding for folks who remember the experience with “Vista Ready” and “Certified for Vista,” the distinctions between which customers were expected to determine intuitively. In any event, the Hauppage US site then leads customers to a download page, where the most recent drivers appear to be for Vista.

Installing these drivers will also ensure the tuner card does not work with Windows 7. Realizing that Hauppage was a UK-based company, we tried the same route on the British site. There we located the absolute latest version of the driver, which we would later discover will work with Windows 7, without the need for any Compatibility Mode.
Once you’ve downloaded the proper driver for whatever TV tuner card you have, there’s a proper order for getting everything set up properly. Here’s the method that worked for us:

1. Uninstall the current tuner card driver. Make sure Media Center is exited when you do.

2. Clean any instance of the driver files from your computer. You don’t want Windows 7 automatically re-installing the drivers you just uninstalled after you reboot. With the Hauppage driver kit, there’s an .EXE file for doing just this, called HCWCLEAR.EXE. Then reboot the PC.

3. Let Windows 7 try to reinstall the driver automatically and fail. It will create an entry for “Multimedia Device” in your Device Manager, and put a little exclamation mark icon next to it. Let that happen, but do not use Device Manager to try to reinstall the newer driver — in other words, avoid any temptation to right-click on this entry and “Update Driver.”

4. Install the latest driver using the TV tuner card manufacturer’s setup file. Hauppage offers its driver packages in two forms, one of which contains the WinTV program; we’ve noted that WinTV and Media Center are typically incompatible with one another anyway. So if you happen to have the larger package that contains WinTV, skip the on-screen step that asks you to install WinTV.

5. Reboot the PC again. But don’t start Media Center, not yet.

6. Open a command line with administrator privileges. I keep a link to CMD.EXE on the Start Menu, then right-click on it and select Open as Administrator.

7. Navigate to the Media Center directory. (Yes, you’re using the old cd command.) Typically you’ll find this in a folder under your Windows home directory, usually \windows\ehome
8. Run the following command: mcupdate -MediaCenterRecoveryTask You won’t get an on-screen response, so don’t worry when you see nothing happen.

9. Launch Windows Media Center. At this point, you will have erased the setup that should have been erased during the Windows 7 upgrade process — the setup that only pertains to Vista anyway. Yes, you have to start from scratch and re-introduce Media Center to your TV tuner. But hey — it’s there! And in a few minutes, you’ll be able to watch — and more importantly for your setup, record — live TV.

On a related note: XP and Vista users had discovered they were able to network their set-top boxes to their PCs using a Firewire connection, and with the aid of some remarkable drivers called ExDeus created by a private citizen, record HD digital shows using Media Center. Unfortunately, many of these users are now reporting that these private drivers (nor their predecessor, another private effort called FireSTB) are not working in Windows 7. So for the meantime, some folks are sticking with Vista until either someone takes the time to rewrite the drivers, or another relatively reasonable digital recording solution makes itself available.

Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009

Link to the original site

Microsoft Opens Windows to Eclipse Developers

Microsoft will let developers who use Eclipse-based IDEs integrate their Java and PHP applications with the latest versions of Windows, Silverlight and the forthcoming Azure cloud platform.

Link to the original site

Security fixes, JavaScript update bog down Internet Explorer 8

By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

The final test editions of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 8, released while Windows 7 was still in the technical preview phase, suggested that its performance could very well triple that of its predecessor, the venerable IE7. When the RTM edition first became available, its performance was pared down a bit, but still better than double that of IE7, based on Betanews’ assessments at the time.

But we’ve noticed a trend of IE8 performance dragging down over time, while every other major Windows browser in the field was headed the other direction — and fast. Early this month, when Firefox 3.6 Beta 1 appeared imminent (and still is at this moment), we calculated the performance difference between IE8 and IE7 at about 75%.

After the last round of security fixes two weeks ago, plus an out-of-cycle update to Microsoft’s JavaScript (JScript) engine this week, the performance gap across Windows platforms has averaged down even more, to an all-time low of 54%. This even though Betanews tweaked its testing suite even more in the last few weeks, in response to changing circumstances with one of our benchmark providers — our CRPI suite now includes a few test batteries that should have cut IE8 some slack.

In our latest round of tests, IE8 scored a CRPI of 1.54, which means on average, users can expect 54 better overall performance from IE8 than they would have seen from IE7 running on Windows Vista SP2.

We also could not help but notice that the latest JScript update was applied to Windows XP and Vista platforms only — at least in the Automatic Updates distributions that we received. After those updates were applied, IE8 performance in Vista and XP were dragged down so heavily that IE8 on Windows 7 is now the fastest of the three platforms: 1.63 for Win7 versus 1.59 for XP and 1.41 for Vista. Since we’ve been testing on the Windows 7 RTM platform, browsers have typically been 10 to 15% faster on XP SP3 than on Win7.

What happened? First of all, we’ve noticed that since Patch Tuesday, IE8 has completely failed the portion of the advanced SlickSpeed selectors test that focuses on the browser’s native JavaScript library, on all three platforms (“failed” meaning, it couldn’t perform the programmed job on all 56 heats). This is the one portion of the SlickSpeed test that IE8 used to perform quite well on. On XP over the past few weeks, IE8′s score on SlickSpeed slipped from 2.45 on October 13, to 1.67 yesterday.

Meanwhile, the SunSpider test suite written by the WebKit team shows a noticeable slowdown in the calculation department in all categories, but again, on XP and Vista and not Windows 7. On XP, IE8′s SunSpider score slipped from a 6.02 to a 5.79. On Windows 7, meanwhile, the SunSpider score improved from a 5.66 to a 5.93. (These scores are relative; a 6.00 would mean “six times faster than IE7 on Vista SP2.” We post relative scores on tests using identical hardware in order that the hardware can be factored out of the equation; in other words, we believe IE8 is only 54% faster than IE7 on any machine you choose.)

It’s computational test scores where IE8 is flagging; by comparison, rendering scores are flat to slightly higher across the board. We’re still in the midst of tallying scores for other browsers, and plan to post those results along with test scores for the first public Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Beta 1 once that browser (finally) becomes available.

Some Betanews readers have asked us why we use IE7 on Vista as our performance index rather than IE8, and up to now, our answer has been because it’s the slowest browser we test, and thus gives us a more granular sense of performance improvements for all the more modern browsers in current use. If this trend keeps up, though, we may just change our minds.

Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009

Link to the original site

At long last, Microsoft to release Outlook .PST file specifications

By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

Three weeks ago, the European Commission signaled its approval of Microsoft’s revised plan for a more vendor-neutral Web browser selection screen for European Windows users. But that revised plan was buffered with a big bonus: a promise to supply the general public with a wealth of interoperability information, including about proprietary formats.

Among the most sought after formats on that list has been for Outlook Personal Folders — the much-maligned .PST file format, whose lack of comprehension has been the pet peeve of certainly every developer who’s ever worked on a calendar or smartphone synchronization utility. Now the manager for Microsoft’s new Office Interoperability Group announced this morning that work is under way on public documentation for the file format.

“This will allow developers to read, create, and interoperate with the data in .PST files in server and client scenarios using the programming language and platform of their choice,” reads Paul Lorimer’s notice this morning. “The technical documentation will detail how the data is stored, along with guidance for accessing that data from other software applications. It also will highlight the structure of the .PST file, provide details like how to navigate the folder hierarchy, and explain how to access the individual data objects and properties.”

Although Microsoft had already documented the Outlook Object Model, that was essentially the type library, or interface, for .NET applications to address components of the running Outlook 2007 application. That’s only helpful if you’re a developer of an add-on or some other product that assumes that Outlook is running. What Microsoft is promising today goes much deeper: As a Microsoft spokesperson told Betanews this afternoon, the specification will actually enable some organizations to finally comply with new government policies for corporate governance, especially with regard to maintenance of interoffice communications.

Back in March 2007, the issue of whether Outlook’s ability to automatically delete old communications was brought to light by way of AMD’s ongoing antitrust suit against Intel. At that time, Intel’s attorneys claimed the company inadvertently destroyed much of the internal e-mails it had been ordered to keep, on account of an internal network policy enabling Outlook to destroy old .PST files. Knowing that such a loss was possible, Intel managers had instructed their staff to create new, personal .PST files that could not be destroyed.

Had a better understanding of the .PST file format been available at the time, theoretically, forensic engineers may have been able to recover deleted .PST material from backups, or from hard drives that were also in use for other purposes.

The documentation will be released under the company’s Open Specification Promise, which was unveiled in February 2008 with the expectation that the .PST format would certainly be among those that the European Commission would expect to see opened up. But even after today’s announcement, the matter of when the documentation would be released, was left undetermined. As Lorimer puts it, the amount of time Microsoft expects to take will be determined by how long “industry experts and interested customers” may take reviewing the drafts, “to ensure that it is clear and useful.”

Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009

Link to the original site

Take a Look at the Windows API Code Pack for the Microsoft .NET Framework

The Windows API Code Pack for the Microsoft .NET Framework provides a source code library that can be used to access some new Windows 7 features (and some existing features of older versions of the Windows operating system) from managed code. These Windows features are not available to developers today in the .NET Framework.

Link to the original site

Android / Windows 7 Dual Boot Netbook Disappoints

Barence writes “PC Pro has got its hands on Acer’s Aspire One D250 with both Windows 7 and Google Android installed. Anyone who’s played with an Android phone had better get ready for a let-down: Android is far from ready for netbooks. The review laments the lack of a proper Marketplace, the poor implementation of both the inbuilt browser and Firefox, and the general pointlessness of it all in its current incarnation as a quick-boot alternative. Yes, it will get better, but at the moment it’s hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Link to the original site

The Windows 7 launch: The cultural event of the entire afternoon

By Carmi Levy, Betanews

Have you reserved your copy of Windows 7 yet? Did you book off work? Get a babysitter for the kids? Stock up on Red Bull and Doritos?…No? If you’re one of the dozens who pine for midnight door-crasher sales at the electronics big box store and Rolling Stones-themed launch events, you may want to make alternate plans.

For anyone who doesn’t live in a cave in Afghanistan (and even for a few folks who do), this week could be the most exciting one in an age as Microsoft launches its newest — and possibly company-saving — operating system, Windows 7, on Thursday. But 14 years after it redefined the rock-star launch party with Windows 95, and nearly four years after having invested a half-billion dollars selling us Vista, this time around, Microsoft is taking a lower-key approach.

Don’t start me up

The company isn’t saying how much it plans to invest in marketing its new OS, but the message around the October 22 launch event itself suggests the days of Jay Leno hawking the OS to the tune of “Start Me Up” are firmly history. This Thursday, expect Steve Ballmer to deliver an uncharacteristically subdued message at the launch event — no tossed chairs or spontaneous onstage cheers. The good times, for Microsoft and for us, ended a while ago.

Carmi Levy: Wide Angle Zoom (200 px)As much as we all pine for the days when a new operating system from Microsoft was a cultural event, the new reality is that hardly anything changes when a new OS is released. Given the back seat that operating systems in general now take with respect to other, sexier elements of the technology that increasingly defines our work and home lives, Win7 could be an absolute yawn.

When Apple’s Mac OS X Snow Leopard replaced Leopard earlier this year, the underpinnings of the Mac universe remained largely as they had existed before. Likewise, don’t expect Windows 7 to rewrite the history books. Your PC works just fine today, and it’ll work just as fine on the 22nd and beyond, no matter what OS you run. Whatever comes next from any given vendor will forevermore be merely an evolutionary increment just beyond currently available offerings.

There’s a reason an Apple iPhone-themed event often jumps into mainstream media, while an updated Mac OS stays firmly on the tech pages. Mobility is as sexy today as the desktop OS was 15 years ago, and each new release is, for now anyway, a quantum bump over the suddenly dowdy stuff we’re carrying around in our pockets. But even this won’t last forever: Hang around long enough and something will come along eventually to relegate mobile hardware and operating systems to a similar place. It’s how tech works, and just as individual products have a limited shelf life, so, too, do entire categories.

Ah, what memories…

Too good for their own good

In so many ways, Microsoft and its mainstream consumer and enterprise OS competitors have done too good a job creating the ultimate in commoditized software. The modern OS is so ruthlessly capable of everything we demand of it, that choosing between them is largely a matter of personal taste. While the flame wars between Mac and Windows fans will continue until long after computers have morphed into tiny networked processors that are implanted into our heads at birth, it’s a safe bet that you can get pretty much anything done on one that you can get done on the other.

Not every technological road is as drivable, of course. While some users may find certain functions easier on a given platform, the bad old days of locking yourself out of entire classes of software and functionality because you chose one OS over the other are pretty much over. We will, of course, save discussions on gaming for Macs for another day. Whatever apps you run, no matter what OS you choose, the borders that used to define your playground have long since been torn down. OS choice no longer defines how free you are to move data and workflow between machines or networks.

Where we’re all headed: Up

Indeed, moving data around is an increasingly quaint notion thanks to the rise of the cloud. While Microsoft’s recent unfortunate Sidekick data lost-and-found incident (whether or not you take Microsoft’s word for it that the incident took place “below” the cloud somewhere) may have cast some well-deserved shadows on the cloud movement, the trend is unavoidable. You can resist entrusting your data to a Web-based service until you’re blue in the face, but it’s hard to ignore reality, and as Microsoft shifts its attention to its online offerings — Azure’s coming next month — because, frankly, it has to, the locally-focused OS will gradually fade from its longstanding frontline role.

It’s a bit of a tough pill to swallow, especially for those of us who remember the Windows 95 launch. It was as close to mainstream mania as Microsoft will ever get, and it marked the desktop operating system’s coming out party after over a decade of living on mostly beige boxes in mostly corporate environments. As much as earlier versions of Windows had driven consumer adoption of PCs, it was Windows 95 that punched the OS into the average consumer’s mind and convinced us all that PCs didn’t just get work done. Windows 95 also made PCs fun, not to mention attainable and usable for the legions of folks who never got DOS and were still struggling to understand GUIs on the decidedly lame GUI of Windows 3.1.

As impressive a product as Windows 7 seems to be, it doesn’t move the bar over Vista and XP as much as Windows 95 did over 3.1 and even DOS. Even if it did, we’d all be fogging the windows at the Verizon store, begging for some in-hand time with a new Droid-powered device. Which explains why I’ve already booked my time off from work, called the babysitter and stocked the fridge and pantry with enough munchies to feed an entire block party. We’re still celebrating the introduction of new technology, except it no longer sits exclusively on a desk.

Carmi Levy is a Canadian-based independent technology analyst and journalist still trying to live down his past life leading help desks and managing projects for large financial services organizations. He comments extensively in a wide range of media, and works closely with clients to help them leverage technology and social media tools and processes to drive their business.

Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009

Link to the original site

Windows 7 Released Early In UK

CNETNate writes “UK customers have been reporting that they received their copies of Windows 7 in the mail today. Currently the British postal service is threatening industrial action over pay, and planned walkouts may result in Windows 7 not being delivered on its release date. It is understood that Microsoft has agreed to let some retailers send out copies early to avoid disappointment, and to make the UK the first country in the world to have Windows 7 in customers’ hands.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Link to the original site